How it got in the way of its science.
It’s what happens to politicized bureaucracies.
How it got in the way of its science.
It’s what happens to politicized bureaucracies.
A bunch of reasons to have one.
I’m not particularly persuaded by the carbon footprint thing, though.
Well, partially because it’s being dishonestly rammed down our throats to promote economically harmful policies.
Monte Morin has a great piece on him and the ISEE-3 reboot.
Would these stop tornadoes? And would they be worth the money?
Did their diet prevent dental caries?
Has NASA/NOAA been fiddling with it to match expectations rather than reality?
Hey, guys, please stop saying dumb things about it.
No, you can’t just rewrite the law to justify your junk science, EPA.
This is a good victory, but it doesn’t completely undo the damage from the court’s previous decision, which was also based on junk science.
This seems like a pretty clear explanation to me.