Bob Zubrin says it’s time to legalize it.
Given the EPA’s track record, I’m not inclined to give them the benefit of the doubt.
Bob Zubrin says it’s time to legalize it.
Given the EPA’s track record, I’m not inclined to give them the benefit of the doubt.
…versus reality. I don’t know why anyone takes this fraud seriously.
Oh, and on another front, an “unprecedented event” is occurring right on time.
…hit a twenty-year low, and with no carbon trading schemes. But California continues its economic insanity.
A new twist on game and evolutionary theory.
Explained, by xkcd. This experiment is much safer than the high-speed baseball pitch, but still, don’t try it at home.
Explained: it was caused by Canadian PM Harper cutting climate-change funding.
Of course! It’s so obvious now. Why didn’t I think of that?
Well, this twitter feed was inevitable. It’s pretty good.
…of Tom Friedman. Friedman gets entirely too much respect for his intelligence.
Is Curiosity a sign of a new NASA?
I’ll believe there’s a new NASA when Webb and SLS are finally put out of their misery. But the problem isn’t just NASA — it’s Congress.
Lileks, with some thoughts on evangelistic atheism:
Religion seeks the metaphysical truth to existence, and science explains the physical truth. The former is predicated on accepting the unprovable, and hence science is not its opposite. That’s the part I don’t get: the need to set up science as a contrapositive model. It’s like saying you shouldn’t want to see the Batman movie because the jetstream is dipping south and dragging cold moist Canadian air over the planes. Huh? I want to see Batman. But rain will be falling over most of the Dakotas. Why does that matter? It’s the Batman movie. The rain will be too late for the small grains, but may prepare the soil for next year. I think we’re talking about two different things.
I’ve never understood it, either. Of course, these are the same people who idiotically assume that because I’m skeptical about Warmageddon, that I must be a Christian creationist.