The National Research Council has come out with a list of sixteen. Does anyone else see something conspicuous by its absence? Hint: it’s necessary for orbital refueling.
[Late afternoon update]
Here’s the full report.
[Bumped]
The National Research Council has come out with a list of sixteen. Does anyone else see something conspicuous by its absence? Hint: it’s necessary for orbital refueling.
[Late afternoon update]
Here’s the full report.
[Bumped]
AP (at the Huffington Post, of all places) says he got a bum rap. I still think that we could get back to the moon by 2020. But NASA can’t, not as long as Congress is in charge.
I have some thoughts about the current state of affairs, on the ninth anniversary of the loss of Columbia.
Thoughts and some history from Bob Zubrin. The plan, at least as stated by Bob, has a (as Newt would say) “fundamental” flaw in it:
There would be at least two prizes: a $5 billion prize to develop and demonstrate a heavy-lift booster capable of lifting at least 100 tons to low Earth orbit, and a $10 billion prize for the first human mission to Mars. In addition, the winners of these prizes would be given contracts for the purchase by NASA of an additional five copies of their flight systems at a recurring cost of 20 percent of the respective prize per copy.
Prizes should specify the goal, not the means to achieve it. It presumes without evidence the need for an arbitrarily-sized heavy lifter. Bob, if you want to get to Mars, then put out a prize for Mars, but don’t tell people how to do it.
Just a reminder, that Brian Wang and I will be on Fast-Forward Radio tonight, at 8 PM Pacific.
This story is very misleading, in that it implies that the only problem with first-stage vibrations was astronauts’ inability to read displays. The solution described here does nothing to address the actual structural issues in the second stage that the resonance creates. That was no five-dollar fix.
Behind the scenes, with Michael Belfiore.
I’ll be on tomorrow night with Brian Wang, to discuss moon colonies.
Jeff Foust has a comprehensive story about the space-policy discussion in the Florida primary over the past week.
…to solve the Russian spaceflight problems. Thoughts from Jim Oberg, over at The Space Review.