Clark Lindsey doesn’t usually editorialize, but he does in this report:
Cooke:
– Powerpoint graphics showing Ares I/V, Orion, Altair
– Factors in selecting architecture include performance end-to-end, risk, development cost, life-cycle cost, schedule, lunar surface systems architecture.
– Implementation according to NASA institutional health and transition from Shuttle, competition in contracts, civil service contractor rules.
– Discusses the studies that justify the Constellation architecture that Griffin had decided on long before he came to NASA as director and long before the studies were done.
– Will get problems like thrust oscillation solved.
– NASA proposes to stay on course through a change in administrations. Surprise, surprise…
Emphasis mine. Are they actually openly admitting that Mike ignored all of the CE&R studies, and just did what he planned to do before he was administrator?
This was amusing:
The Coalition for Space Exploration shows a brand new NASA space exploration promotion video. Gawd. After the last panel I felt like killing myself. No problem. I can watch this video again and die of boredom…
He has some other pretty tart comments as well.
[Early afternoon update]
As Clark notes in comments, that reference to Griffin’s plans were his words, not Steve Cooke’s.