NASA’s love is gone.
They’d gotten too cocky; it lasted far too long.
NASA’s love is gone.
They’d gotten too cocky; it lasted far too long.
Clark Lindsey has his weekly roundup.
The White House just released an executive order that in effect repudiates the Moon Agreement. I’ve been urging them to do this for months. This could be a prelude to start to pressure Canberra to withdraw from it.
It also encourages the development of multilateral agreements, which I’ve also been promoting.
[Update a while later]
Glenn Reynolds has the full press release.
One of the significant things about this, that many won’t realize, is that it effectively bypasses COPUOS.
[Update Tuesday morning]
Here‘s Jeff Foust’s story.
[Update Wednesday morning]
Here’s the story from Mike Wall. I don’t think this is right, though:
The new executive order makes things even more official, stressing that the United States does not view space as a “global commons” and sees a clear path to off-Earth mining, without the need for further international treaty-level agreements.
It specifically says that it is seeking bilateral and/or multilateral agreements. What it doesn’t think is necessary is doing this through the UN, or COPUOS.
[Bumped]
[Update a while later]
TASS: “Privatizing” space is “unacceptable.”
Putin’s trying to eat his cake and have it, too. He wants us to abide by the Moon Agreement without Russia actually acceding to it. This sort of nonsense is one of the reasons I’d been pushing for what the White House did.
[Update a while later]
Here’s some nonsense from the Grauniad.
[Saturday-morning update]
A piece from Popular Mechanics. This isn’t quite right, though: “…the ESA plan describes an interest in regolith, which is lunar soil rich in specific elements.”
Regolith per se is not soil; soil implies a biome, or at least fertilizer. also, it does not need to be rich in any particular element or elements to be regolith. Regolith is simply dust or rocks on a planetary surface. The entire lunar surface is covered with it, and nothing else, other than our few artifacts in a few locations.
[Bumped]
Clark Lindsey has the latest roundup, including the most recent Chinese launch failure, the second within a month.
It was using Clinton-era flight computers. This is a common problem in aerospace. New avionics can’t necessarily be trusted for mission-critical tasks. The Shuttle computers were basically IBM-360s, all the way into the 90s.
OK, can someone explain why the Space Command (I refuse to call it a force) is delaying a GPS launch on a Falcon 9 until the end of June, but NASA still plans to go ahead with the Commercial Crew test flight in May?
This may be entertaining, but the notion that the purpose of the Space Force is to go back to the moon is a false premise. But of course, now everyone will think that it is, because they saw it on a teevee show.
Congratulations on the award. Let’s hope they can do it, and on schedule. We’re going to see a lot of lunar activity in the coming years, regardless of Artemis.
Hard to believe it’s the half-century anniversary.