…and “smart diplomacy.”
So much for that “Arab Spring,” eh?
[Update a few minutes later]
“The media regards Obama with the devotion that Islamists grant to the Koran. Any criticism and they’re out for blood…”
…and “smart diplomacy.”
So much for that “Arab Spring,” eh?
[Update a few minutes later]
“The media regards Obama with the devotion that Islamists grant to the Koran. Any criticism and they’re out for blood…”
From Instapundit:
Advice to Obama: To stiffen your spine, imagine these were Tea Partiers instead of Islamic fundamentalists who hate America and all it stands for.
Democrats never want to “win” wars, only “end” them, except when they’re against domestic enemies.
I don’t really have anything new to say, but Glenn has a link roundup.
What the Democrat’s platform really tells us.
And now the crucifixions have begun. Because the Quran, you know, the the book of the Religion of Peace™? requires it.
More thoughts on the late Stalinist:
Sometimes, this hypocrisy took the form of amnesia. In 1980, when the Afghans were getting their own taste of the Brezhnev doctrine, Cockburn wrote of their country:
An unspeakable country filled with unspeakable people, sheepshaggers and smugglers, who have furnished in their leisure hours some of the worst arts and crafts ever to penetrate the occidental world…. If ever a country deserved rape it’s Afghanistan. Nothing but mountains filled with barbarous ethnics with views as medieval as their muskets, and unspeakably cruel too.
That, you see, is what they call “speaking truth to power.” Predictably, Cockburn opposed the American invasion of Afghanistan in 2001. An alleged “radical,” he nevertheless defended the status quo when it came to the most barbaric reactionaries and seemed comfortable with, if not amenable to, the death-cult establishments in Palestine and Lebanon. In fact, when I think hard about it, I wonder why this man was considered a radical at all. When your essential worldview is shaped by the writings of a 19th century German philosopher, you are not a radical. When you publish op-eds by dictators who have been in power since Eisenhower was president, you are, in a very literal sense, a conservative. When you’re skeptical about everything except Josef Stalin, you cannot be said to have a very developed sense of bucking “the establishment.”
Really, these people are quite odious.
“Not yours.”
More thoughts on the hypocrisy and appeasement of the IOC from Ilya Somin.
Like the UN, I wouldn’t shed a tear if the IOC and the Olympics themselves disappeared from the planet.
Andrew McCarthy has some questions for John McCain and Speaker Boehner:
So I was hoping maybe the speaker could explain to us: Hypothetically, if Huma Abedin did have a bias in favor of the Muslim Brotherhood, and if she were actually acting on that bias to try to tilt American policy in favor of the Muslim Brotherhood, what exactly would the State Department be doing differently?
Yes, I’d like to see an explanation of that, too. But Huma’s not really the problem — Barack Obama is.
Why does it still exist?
It outlived whatever usefulness it may have ever had decades ago.