Only 99.7%?

Great. There’s apparently a major security flaw in Android phones:

“The reality is, you’re carrying around a desktop computer in your pocket — but there’s no security like there is on computers,” explained Dave Aitel, president of security firm Immunity Inc. and a former computer scientist for the National Security Agency.

And no smartphone comes with antivirus software, experts noted.

Android-based smartphones use security tokens to grant access to only certain bits of information on the phone, Aitel explained, such as the Calendar or Google Reader. The token for Gmail is encrypted; all other tokens are unencrypted, he said — and they’re incredibly easy to steal.

“The tokens are essentially keys that only unlock part of the house,” Aitel told FoxNews.com. And because they’re passed to Google servers unencrypted, a cybersnoop could easily swipe one while a consumer is surfing the web in Starbucks.

My biggest concern about my Droid is the fact that it backs up to the cloud, and doesn’t offer a way to store data locally, as I did with my Palm device and Palm desktop. Google’s going to have to make a major effort to straighten this out, with Verizon and others.

[Update a few minutes later]

Apparently, they’ve already fixed this particular problem on the server side, but I suspect this will be an ongoing issue.

From Climate Alarmist

…to skeptic:

At this point, official “climate science” stopped being a science. In science, empirical evidence always trumps theory, no matter how much you are in love with the theory. If theory and evidence disagree, real scientists scrap the theory. But official climate science ignored the crucial weather balloon evidence, and other subsequent evidence that backs it up, and instead clung to their carbon dioxide theory — that just happens to keep them in well-paying jobs with lavish research grants, and gives great political power to their government masters.

Follow the real money.

On War

A book review, of an old book:

On War is shaped by Clausewitz’s encounter with the history and ideas of his times; it is also shaped by his experience in one of the first truly modern bureaucracies. (One of the achievements of Frederick the Great that so impressed contemporaries was the meticulous organization of the Prussian army and state.) The relationship of individual genius and vision to bureaucratic routine is a serious strategic problem in the modern world. The virtues that make a great military commander are, as Clausewitz notes, intensely personal: imagination and moral courage being perhaps the rarest and most valuable. These are perhaps the worst qualities for an aspiring bureaucrat to have.

There are desk generals and battle generals, and the unequal struggle between them is a recurring problem — and not just in military organizations. Desk generals excel in the arts of bureaucratic warfare, stick close to the conventional wisdom in all ways, and were brilliantly described in two unforgettable Gilbert and Sullivan songs: Modern Major General and The First Lord’s Song. In times of peace these timeserving mediocrities rise inexorably to the top; wars usually begin with a painful shakeout while the beribboned and bemedaled lunkheads demonstrate their hopeless incapacity at the true military art. Then and only then do the unclubbable and unconventional officers whose only virtue is their ability to somehow win battles gradually edge to the fore and the Grants and the Shermans elbow past the Popes and the McClellans.

In terms of space, NASA has been at peace since the late sixties, and hasn’t had the necessary crisis to bring forth the war-fighting generals, though the current budget crunch may make it happen. We’re starting to see some signs of it (e.g., Phil McAlister). The problem remains, though, that space isn’t important. Until it is, we won’t take it seriously.

Saint Shirley Is Back

Shirley Sherrod is back at the USDA as a contract employee. Lee Stranahan is on the case:

I think you’ll also see that much of the story about Mrs. Sherrod has served to further the cover-up of the Pigford scandal. As you’ll see, there’s evidence that Mrs. Sherrod has been told about the fraud in Pigford by a number of people. I’ve found no indication that she’s done anything about it. I find the fact that she’s now working with the USDA on ‘outreach’ to be ominous and bad news for the legitimate black farmers who were wronged in the Pigford settlement.

Thanks in advance for your participation and comments as I roll this story out over the next few weeks.

He’s already started.

Don’t Know Much About Science

One of the many reasons that John Huntsman should not be the Republican nominee:

Huntsman says he opposes cap-and-trade proposals because “this isn’t the moment,” but he buys the climate change argument because “90% of the scientists” say it’s happening.

Leave aside that the climate is always changing, I have no idea where he comes up with that number, or why he thinks that science is a democracy. And cap and tax is OK in general, just not now?

Sheesh.

Biting Commentary about Infinity…and Beyond!