The first team this season to lose to Notre Dame defeated Cal.
And the Buckeye-Spartan game was close enough to make both teams worth beating for Michigan’s strength of schedule. Assuming they beat Illinois tonight, of course…
[Sunday morning update]
Sorry, I’d linked the wrong year on the Notre Dame/UCLA game–it’s fixed now. The point remains, though.
“Crooks And Liars” lives up to its name. At least the “Liars” part.
Clark Lindsey has some thoughts on the late Kistler concept, with which I largely agree:
I’ve never thought the K-1 design that they came up with was anywhere close to an ideal RLV. For example, it doesn’t allow for incremental testing to find problems without losing the vehicle as Rutan could do with the SS1. However, it was a proof of principle that even a group of conservative NASA/Apollo/Saturn engineers could sit down and design a two-stage-to-orbit (TSTO) fully reusable vehicle without breaking any laws of physics or requiring even an ounce of unobtainium. Other than the occasional anonymous commenter posting “the K-1 is crap” sort of criticism, I’ve never seen any credible person point to some particular part of the K-1 design and say this definitely is not going to work.
Kistler got 75% of the hardware built for the first K-1 when their target LEO comsat constellation market disappeared and funding dried up. Kistler had at that point spent about $800M but raised only $600M. The company itself had remained relatively small and had farmed out most of the hardware to various mainstream aerospace companies. (SpaceX decided that building many of its major components in house could save lots of money over this outsourcing approach.) People who were involved with other entrepreneurial launch vehicle companies during that period occasionally express annoyance, to say the least, that Kistler Aerospace soaked up most of the private investment available for such ventures yet still didn’t get anything into the air.
I always thought that it was a mistake to hire Apollo retreads for the job. George Mueller and company knew how to get the job done on an unlimited budget, but they didn’t have one (though they had a lot more money than anyone else). There was never any reason to think that they could do things cost effectively. My understanding is that the investors demanded that “space experts” be brought in. Unfortunately, the “space experts” they brought in simply farmed the job out to cost-plus contractors, because that’s all they knew how to do.
Whether they really “soaked up all the private money for such ventures” is hard to know, because the investors that were willing to put money into Kistler weren’t necessarily willing to put money into a company that didn’t have old Apollo hands running it. So perhaps that was their loss, not the industry’s.
Radley Balko wonders why Bush (and Cheney) haters would want Hillary!™ as president.
The 1990s, remember, weren’t exactly a decade of peace. Bill Clinton ordered more U.S. military interventions than any other post-WWII administration, and there’s no reason to think any of them were over Hillary’s protestations. She supported the U.S. military campaigns in Haiti, Kosovo, and Bosnia. She once boasted that as the tension in Kosovo mounted, she called her husband from her trip to Africa and, “I urged him to bomb.”
Hillary Clinton voted for both the Patriot Act and its reauthorization. She voted for building a wall on the U.S.-Mexican border. She voted to loosen restrictions limiting the federal government’s ability to wiretap cell phones. In the past, she has supported a robust role for the federal government in enforcing “decency” standards in television and music. She teamed up with former Sen. Rick Santorum on a bill calling for the federal government to restrict the sale of violent video games.
Leftists concerned about the entertainment industry’s increasingly imperial stand on copyright might take a cue from copyright guru Lawrence Lessig, who wrote on his blog for Wired magazine: “Of all the Dems, I would have bet she was closest to the copyright extremists. So far, she’s done nothing to suggest to the contrary.”
What about secrecy and executive power? It’s difficult to see Hillary Clinton voluntarily handing back all of those extra-constitutional executive powers claimed by President Bush. Her husband’s administration, for example, copiously invoked dubious “executive privilege” claims to keep from complying with congressional subpoenas and open records requests
Not that I’m a big Rudy fan, but this is one of the (few) reasons that I’m glad to no longer be in California.
California is one of the most blessed places on earth, in terms of climate and gorgeous scenery. It’s too bad that it was ruined by all the nutty (recent) Californians.
Re: Harry Reid & Co matching Rush’s E-Bay take for charity, more than a few readers have suggested the easiest way for the Dem Senators to match the funds would be for Hillary to arrange for some itinerant in Chinatown to “bundle” a quick four mil.
There was a World War II charity campaign called “Bundles for Britain”. Senator Clinton needs to launch “Bundles for Harry”.
The real point, of course, is that Rush is donating his own money. The entire Democrat philosophy, though, is to do charity with other peoples’ money.
[Saturday morning update]
Harry Reid and the Letter of Doom.
The Nobel Peace Prize committee disbands.
…90210?
At least for now. As expected, NASA has pulled the plug on their COTS contract, as a result of their inability to hit their funding milestones. Clark Lindsey has a link roundup.
I expect to find a lot more about what’s going on, and their prospects for getting back to focusing on the suborbital business, in New Mexico next week.
It was a little weird seeing Mark Whittington link to his spaghetti sauce recipe today, because this is very similar to my own, which I just happened to have made last night for the first time in months. The only difference is that I add a general Italian seasoning, lemon juice, some honey, and mushrooms. I also use pureed and whole plum tomatoes (canned) in addition to a can of sauce and a can of paste. And I use turkey Italian sausage, hot not sweet.
It’s also a good base sauce for lasagna.
[Afternoon update]
As a commenter notes, another key difference in mine is that I use fresh minced garlic, not powdered. Several cloves.
[One more update]
I also forgot bay leaves. Whole. And rosemary, fresh from the garden, if possible. We used to grow it in California (in fact, one of the residence hotels I stayed at in El Segundo last year had it growing on the hillside), but I’m not sure it does well in the Florida heat.
[Saturday afternoon update]
I just noticed that Mark writes that the sauce isn’t good for someone who is dieting. I’m not sure why he thinks that–it’s an excellent sauce from that standpoint–lots of protein, vegetables (in the form of onions, peppers, tomatoes) and not even a lot of fat if one has drained it off (I use olive oil to sautee things). Atkins would probably cheer it. The problem with it is not the sauce, but the pasta, which is a high-glycemic carbohydrate. I’d at least recommend whole-wheat…