Mother Sheehan is going on a two-month hunger strike. It would be nice if she could keep her mouth shut for other purposes, too.
And no, before the idiots start commenting–that comment didn’t violate her First-Amendment rights. She has a right to say anything she wants, and I have a right to say I wish she wouldn’t. Ain’t the First Amendment great?
Mother Sheehan is going on a two-month hunger strike. It would be nice if she could keep her mouth shut for other purposes, too.
And no, before the idiots start commenting–that comment didn’t violate her First-Amendment rights. She has a right to say anything she wants, and I have a right to say I wish she wouldn’t. Ain’t the First Amendment great?
Mother Sheehan is going on a two-month hunger strike. It would be nice if she could keep her mouth shut for other purposes, too.
And no, before the idiots start commenting–that comment didn’t violate her First-Amendment rights. She has a right to say anything she wants, and I have a right to say I wish she wouldn’t. Ain’t the First Amendment great?
I’ve heard a number of people warn us that oil prices could double, or triple, in the event of a new disturbance (e.g., Iran) in the Middle East. I think that this is ludicrous. So does Larry Kudlow. He explains.
Jeff Foust points out that the usual suspects in Congress are trying to defund the president’s new space initiative. And as usual, they have the same stale, non-sequitur arguments about the relative cost effectivity of “science” between humans and robots, as though that’s the only reason we have a space program (as I point out in comments over there).
Jeff Foust points out that the usual suspects in Congress are trying to defund the president’s new space initiative. And as usual, they have the same stale, non-sequitur arguments about the relative cost effectivity of “science” between humans and robots, as though that’s the only reason we have a space program (as I point out in comments over there).
Jeff Foust points out that the usual suspects in Congress are trying to defund the president’s new space initiative. And as usual, they have the same stale, non-sequitur arguments about the relative cost effectivity of “science” between humans and robots, as though that’s the only reason we have a space program (as I point out in comments over there).
Josh Trevino says that Kos and the Bush-deranged “netroots” are following an old, paranoid model:
Consider the average member of this group. He (or she) remembers the era of leftist dominance of American politics
Here’s an extensive tour of Microsoft Vista.
Here:
Hmm. From “finances” to “astrology” into “politics” in a seemingly easy progression. What is the common element in Armstrong’s blogging efforts in these three successive areas? Answer: BS! Armstrong defended bad stocks, then he defended junk theories of the universe, then he conned a generation of Democrats into thinking they were going to win the 2002 midterms! Now he’s promoting Mark Warner.