I listened to an NPR story this morning covering the recent diet study that showed Atkins to be superior for weight loss over the traditional nostrums of the American Heart Association.

They interviewed the head of the AHA, who was clearly chagrined, and trying to spin his way out of it. Unfortunately, the interviewer let him.

The most egregious thing that he said was that clearly high protein and fat must be a problem, because our kids are getting fat, and they’re eating a lot of fast food, which is full of protein and fat.

The obvious rejoinder to this (of which the reporter didn’t avail himself), is that Atkins would be appalled at a fast food meal. Not for its fat and protein content (which isn’t all that high, at least as far as protein goes), but for its high-glycemic carbohydrate content.

I always find it fascinating to see how the fast-food bashers miss the point, because they continue to worship the food pyramid.

A supersize McDonalds meal contains french fries (lotta carbs), a bun (lot of white bread), and usually a sugary soft drink. The meat and fat are almost an afterthought. Yet when you hear the complaints, the focus is always on the fat, rather than the carbs.

It was disappointing to see the reporter let the AHA head get away with this.

He also trotted out the hoary old tale about how all that mattered was caloric intake and exercise. He still refuses to concede that diet might influence metabolism.

Every study like this erodes the foundation of the food pyramid. Eventually, when the evidence grows too overwhelming, I suspect that we’re going to see it invert.

[Update at 8:30 AM PST]

Here’s another article on the subject from AP.

It also contains blaring ignorance of biochemistry from a supposed nutrition “expert.”

Dr. Alice Lichtenstein, a nutrition expert at Tufts University, said she thinks too much is made of the amounts of carbohydrates and fats in people’s diets as they try to shed weight.

“There is no magic combination of fat versus carbs versus protein,” she said. “It doesn’t matter in the long run. The bottom line is calories, calories, calories.”

Quelle simplisme.

I’m starting to think that movie actors have as much credibility as these people. At least they should.

It’s just about six hours until the peak of the Leonid meteor storm. It probably won’t be this good again in your lifetime, unless Ray Kurzweil is right.

Go check it out tonight.

They’re having a “War on Terror” haiku contest over at Free Republic. There are some pretty good ones.

Predator above
Unseen, a dot in the sky
Al Qaeda flambe’

Some judges still willfully misconstrue the Second Amendment. In upholding a gun conviction, the appellate opinion read:

“In order to establish a violation under the Second Amendment, one must establish [that] he is part of a state militia,” Circuit Judge Robert H. Henry wrote on behalf of the unanimous three-judge panel.

I hope that this one is appealed.

There’s an article on prospects for life extension, and Boomer desires for it, in yesterday’s Orange County Register.

[Update a few minutes later]

And here’s a related story via Instantman–an interview with Ray Kurzweil.

The Supreme Court let an appeals court ruling stand, in which it ruled that Peter Kirsanow had to be allowed on the Civil Rights Commission.

Thus ends Mary Frances Berry’s latest attempted power grab.

Mark Steyn takes on idiot journalists who think that the election was about gender, and in the process makes an important point.

What is a ”women’s issue” anyway? To some, it might be the sacred constitutional right to avail oneself of a partial-birth abortion. But to others it might be the war on terror. After all, if there’s one single issue that distinguishes Western values from Islamofascism, it’s the treatment of women. Imagine being forbidden by law to go to school or leave the house unaccompanied. Imagine the state deciding what clothes you can wear. Imagine being prevented by law from feeling sunlight on your face. I’d say voting for people who liberate women from theocratic fascism is a women’s issue.

He also debunks the notion, apparently undying among some in the media, of the “Clinton charisma.”

My favorite line is the last one, though:

Remind me never to complain about ”liberal media bias” again. Right now, liberal media bias is conspiring to assist the Democrats to sleepwalk over the cliff.

Mark Steyn takes on idiot journalists who think that the election was about gender, and in the process makes an important point.

What is a ”women’s issue” anyway? To some, it might be the sacred constitutional right to avail oneself of a partial-birth abortion. But to others it might be the war on terror. After all, if there’s one single issue that distinguishes Western values from Islamofascism, it’s the treatment of women. Imagine being forbidden by law to go to school or leave the house unaccompanied. Imagine the state deciding what clothes you can wear. Imagine being prevented by law from feeling sunlight on your face. I’d say voting for people who liberate women from theocratic fascism is a women’s issue.

He also debunks the notion, apparently undying among some in the media, of the “Clinton charisma.”

My favorite line is the last one, though:

Remind me never to complain about ”liberal media bias” again. Right now, liberal media bias is conspiring to assist the Democrats to sleepwalk over the cliff.

Mark Steyn takes on idiot journalists who think that the election was about gender, and in the process makes an important point.

What is a ”women’s issue” anyway? To some, it might be the sacred constitutional right to avail oneself of a partial-birth abortion. But to others it might be the war on terror. After all, if there’s one single issue that distinguishes Western values from Islamofascism, it’s the treatment of women. Imagine being forbidden by law to go to school or leave the house unaccompanied. Imagine the state deciding what clothes you can wear. Imagine being prevented by law from feeling sunlight on your face. I’d say voting for people who liberate women from theocratic fascism is a women’s issue.

He also debunks the notion, apparently undying among some in the media, of the “Clinton charisma.”

My favorite line is the last one, though:

Remind me never to complain about ”liberal media bias” again. Right now, liberal media bias is conspiring to assist the Democrats to sleepwalk over the cliff.

What kind of morons would take this web site, about whale watching in Lake Michigan, seriously?

The whales and dolphins have become part of the scenery and culture of the lake, and their connection to its history is as ancient as the Navajo Indians who settled the shore centuries ago. Although there are stories of the whales causing many of the shipwrecks in Lake Michigan in the late 1800s and early 1900s, these have proven to be fables; the freshwater whale is a gentle creature, and any negative reputation is undeserved. Come see for yourself …

What kind of morons? The certified kind (hint: they’re writing educational materials for your kids).

[Update a few minutes later]

I should add, kudos to the Muskegon teacher, Deb Harris, who caught this error and forced the publication to issue a correction.