The CNN video ridicules Trump for saying that global warming is “an expensive hoax.” We should respond by outlining the costs involved. Over one billion dollars a day worldwide is now spent on “climate finance,” according to the San Francisco-based Climate Policy Initiative, yet we see no impact on climate. In 2017, Dr. Bjorn Lomborg, president of the Copenhagen Consensus Center, explained that if the UN Paris Agreement targets for 2030 were met and sustained through the rest of the century, there would be 0.3 degrees Fahrenheit less warming in 2100, if the models relied upon by the UN were correct. He explains that the cost of the Paris pact would be $1 – 2 trillion every year. So clearly, CNN’s criticism tells Trump that he should continue calling it “an expensive hoax,” and cite the cost estimates and forecast results to illustrate his point.
My arm seems to be healing from my overextended bicep helping someone get a heavy object off a shelf at Costco yesterday. Put me into shock at the time — people wanted to call 911 because they thought I was having a heart attack. I managed to dissuade them.
Yeah, no good deed goes unpunished. The thing just fell suddenly when my arm was holding it, and it was a sharp pain. I started to feel a little faint, and had to sit down. They said I was very pale, and I was sweating. But I got them to not call 911, and just get me some water.
I can't imagine what a pain in the ass (and other things) it would have been if they'd called 911. Huge ambulance and maybe emergency-room bill because I'd just pulled an arm muscle.
Though, probably, once I explained to the paramedics what had happened, they'd have not bothered to take me, since I was mostly recovered from the shock by the time they'd have gotten there. So just paramedic bill…
Their concern was understandable; I did have symptoms of heart attack: pain in left arm, nausea, faintness, sweating, etc. But I knew what it was. I had to keep explaining to them that my arm hurt because I'd injured it, and the other (temporary) symptoms were all from shock.
I’d like to eat actual lab-grown meat, but it has to be cost effective, and nutritionally equivalent to the stuff on the hoof (or claw).
[Update a couple minutes later]
In reading, as is often the case, part of the health claim derives from the false notion that eating “red meat,” and particularly saturated fat, is unhealthy. There is zero scientific evidence for either. So they’re basically proposing to replace something humans have been eating since the dawn of humanity with some lab-produced glop about which we are completely ignorant of its nutritional effects.
A refutation of a stupid thesis (including a dumb book by Chris Mooney). If I had time, I’d write a book called “The Democrats’ War On Science.” It would have a more solid basis than Mooney’s.
Oh, and this once again puts paid to the notion of “peer review” as having any value.