This is cool.
I wonder if Lennox was a Mason? There’s a good case to be made that the American Revolution was a trans-Atlantic Masonic conspiracy.
This is cool.
I wonder if Lennox was a Mason? There’s a good case to be made that the American Revolution was a trans-Atlantic Masonic conspiracy.
Even some of his fans aren’t impressed with his new show. I hadn’t realized the fool was anti-nuclear, too. The Planetary Society should be ashamed to have him as its head.
[Update late morning]
Oh, good lord:
“My vagina has its own voice / Not vocal cords, a metaphorical voice / Sometimes I do a voice for my vagina,” she sings. Charming.
Then there are these super-scientific lines: “Versatile love may have some butt stuff / It’s evolution, ain’t nothing new / There’s nothing taboo about a sex stew.”
In effect, whatever was left of the manmade climate change zealot’s credibility was officially wiped out, unlike our Antarctic ice sheets. Of course, there wasn’t too much credibility left to demolish; this is a guy who once suggested climate change dissent be criminalized and said poignantly “many, many, many, many more hundreds of eggs are fertilized than become humans.”
There really are no words suitable to describe the unhinged absurdity of the segment, so here’s the video with full lyrics for you to witness for yourself. (My sincere apologies for the awfulness in advance.)
I didn’t watch.
[Afternoon update]
And then there’s this.
The biological definition of sex boils down to gametes, apparently Bill Nye has just discovered a third type of gamete beside egg and sperm pic.twitter.com/euBAP0oVxO
— Yeyo (@YeyoZa) April 24, 2017
#Science!
[Update a few minutes later]
@secupp @BillNye @Racheldoesstuff This should be preserved to explain to future scientist why we had to neuter and spay all the millennials
— David Burge (@iowahawkblog) April 24, 2017
Is she about to become the most powerful person in Europe?
Given the way Europe is imploding, may be.
It’s the equivalent of Holocaust denial for the Left.
Yup. Particularly considering that the Holocaust itself was a leftist project. There’s nothing “right wing” (if by that you mean conservative, or libertarian) about rounding up and murdering people wholesale.
[Late-morning update]
Related: Venezuela’s socialist hell. This is always the inevitable end state, but “Hey, this time it will be different,” say Bernie supporters.
[Update a couple minutes later]
Twenty die in Venezuelan protests. Sadly, the only hope for them is to get them arms, since the government has confiscated them and armed its own supporters. As I said, this is the inevitable end state, and ultimately why we have a Second Amendment here.
But it’s hard to resurrect the presses.
What’s the best resolution you can get in a 3-D printer these days? Seems like that might be a good method.
I really need to get a new interconnect and cartridge for my Rega Planar 2 and Grace 707 tonearm.
…is getting increasingly interested in space.
Derek Lowe explains why he won’t be marching. I agree.
Same. It may be a march for many things, but science isn't one of them. https://t.co/0lIblN6ibV
— Rand Simberg (@Rand_Simberg) April 21, 2017
[Update a while later]
Arthur Lambert isn’t attending either:
…there’s no denying this march is political. It is a mistake to position the scientific method against the Trump administration or any other one, for that matter. That would serve only to undermine a central premise of the march: that scientific knowledge is apolitical. Organizers argue that the march is “nonpartisan.” While this may be the official line, I’m skeptical of whether anything approaching it can actually be achieved, especially on the heels of a divisive election. For example, I recently spoke with a colleague who was organizing a poster-making session for the march. She proudly described her design as an “I’m With Her” arrow pointing toward planet Earth.
I was also “with her” last November, but that should be beside the point. I fear that, contrary to its mission of inclusion, the march may actually alienate many of those it seeks to convince. Scientists are highly educated, the academic version of the 1 percent Wall Street class. They are also overwhelming Democratic. I can assure you that this has little to no impact on their science or for the potential public impact of their findings. But it would not be unreasonable for a rural blue-collar worker, watching the marches from afar, to perceive them as yet another attack from the condescending elite. We cannot drum up the broad support for science that the march seeks by aggravating a deep divide already present in this country.
Want more Trump? This is how you get more Trump.
[Update a while later]
Bill Nye is the perfect talking head for a march against science:
March organizers have paid lip service to critical thinking and “diverse perspectives” in science. However, Nye is a good example of someone who promotes science as a close-minded ideology, not an open search for truth.
He attacks those who disagree with him on climate change or evolution as science “deniers.” He wouldn’t even rule out criminal prosecution as a tool. Asked last year whether he supported efforts to jail climate skeptics as war criminals, he replied: “Well, we’ll see what happens. Was it appropriate to jail the guys from ENRON?”
Real science encourages debate. It doesn’t insist that scientists march in lockstep. Or that they speak with one voice. In fact, scientists disagree on far more issues than the March organizers admit.
Bill Nye the lock-up-the-heretics guy.
[Update mid morning]
Bob Zimmerman says that the march against science is a Democrat Party operation.
[Update a while later]
“I love Neil de Grasse Tyson, but he’s wrong on climate.”
I don’t find him all that lovable, myself.
[Sunday evening update]
Judith Curry has a lot of links to “untangle the March for Science.”
[Bumped]
[Monday-morning update]
Bill Nye the Constitutional-Ignorance Guy.
[Update a while later]
Nye freaks out when schooled by an actual scientist on CNN. Just like his meltdown with Tucker Carlson.
How it helped create a massive public-health disaster.
You can guess what this one is about. It killed my father. I wish I could tell it to prepare to die, but it may finally be happening, anyway.
[Update a while later]
Ron Bailey reviews a new book on an epidemic of epidemiology.
A deep dive into what Elon is trying to do now. #Transhumanism
[Sunday-afternoon update]
@juancarlosrs @elpilot That is the aspiration: to avoid AI becoming other.
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) April 23, 2017
This is just beautiful. I wish I’d written it.
[Sunday-afternoon update]
Kevin Williamson refuses to be outdone by T. A. Frank:
…as the poet said, there ain’t no cure for love, and Democrats just can’t quit the Big Creep.
So they’ve turned to the Little Creep.
Chelsea Clinton, most recently lionized on the cover of Vanity Fair, is a 37-year-old multi-millionaire who has never uttered an interesting word about any subject at any time during the course of her life. Judging from the evidence of her public statements, she has never had an original thought — it isn’t clear that she has had a thought at all. In tribute to her parents, she was given a series of lucrative sinecures, producing a smattering of sophomoric videos for NBC at a salary of $600,000 a year. She later went more formally into the family business, leaving her fake job at NBC for a fake job in her parents’ fake charity. She gave interviews about how she just couldn’t get interested in money and bought a $10 million Manhattan apartment that stretches for the better part of a city block. And, since her mother’s most recent foray into ignominious defeat, she has been inescapable: magazine covers, fawning interviews, talk of running her in New York’s 17th congressional district.
The Democrats are doing their best to make Chelsea happen. And, who knows, it might work. It would be tempting to write her off as a know-nothing rich kid who has made a living off her family connections while operating one of the world’s most truly asinine Twitter accounts, but . . . well, you know.
But, for Pete’s sake, stop it. Have a little self-respect, Democrats. Build Bill Clinton a statue or . . . whatever. Send him your daughters like a bunch of bone-in-the-nose primitives paying tribute to the tribal chieftain. But stop trying to inflict this empty-headed, grasping, sanctimonious, risible, simpering, saccharine little twerp on American public life.
They won’t stop. They can’t help themselves.