Christians are fighting alongside Hezbollah to fight ISIS.
Well, it’s true that while Hezbollah does want an Islamic state, it hasn’t been murdering Christians, as far as I know.
Planet Obama
Where self awareness goes to die:
Alas, among the Obamas, self-awareness is not a strong suit, and this particular deficit isn’t limited to the first lady. This week, at Georgetown University, the president bemoaned the scourge of private schools, driven by “an anti-government ideology that disinvests from those common goods and those things that draw us together.”
One wonders: Did he feel that way as a teenager while in the bosom of the exclusive Punahou prep school in Honolulu? The Obama children, of course, attend Sidwell Friends, a private institution that costs $37,750 a year. Before moving to Washington, D.C., Sasha and Malia studied at the University of Chicago’s elite Laboratory School, where middle school tuition runs at $29,328.
Intellectual consistency is for the little people.
[Update a few minutes later]
“How can Obama object to private schools when his children attend one, he went to one?”
A Better Way To Open The Solar System
I see that Culberson just essentially wrote into law that SLS must be used for the Europa mission. Which means that he probably just doomed it.
Because of micromanagement by Congress, NASA’s plans for exploring (forget about developing) the solar system are FUBAR, at least in terms of human spaceflight. The NRC report last summer, and even the more recent JPL/Aerospace study are economically and programmatically insane, because they are compelled to use a vehicle that will probably never get built, and if it does, will be a drag of billions per year on the NASA budget.
I’ve got some free time right now, and a need for some income. I’m thinking about doing a new Kickstarter to show what could be done with that same budget over decades, if relieved of the shackles that Congress places on it. I think that the output would put any current plans to shame, in terms of what could be accomplished. It would be a handy document to have when the subject comes up for debate again, in the next administration.
Who would support it?
Climate Change “Consensus”
“When it’s a consensus among the uninformed, it’s not worth much“:
What can we take away from all this? First, lots of people get called “climate experts” and contribute to the appearance of consensus, without necessarily being knowledgeable about core issues. A consensus among the misinformed is not worth much.
Second, it is obvious that the “97 per cent” mantra is untrue. The underlying issues are so complex it is ludicrous to expect unanimity. The near 50/50 split among AMS members on the role of greenhouse gases is a much more accurate picture of the situation. The phony claim of 97 per cent consensus is mere political rhetoric aimed at stifling debate and intimidating people into silence.
Yes. Anyone who cites that number at this point is either a liar or appallingly ignorant.
[Update a while later]
Related, I was going to post about this interview with Jerry Taylor, formerly of Cato, who seems to aspire to be continually out of synch with reality:
I began to change, maybe five or six years ago, for several reasons.
One, the scientific evidence became stronger and stronger over time. A lot of conservatives think of climate change as similar to the population issue. You have to remember, in the ’60s and ’70s people were frantic about population growth. And it just peeled away as an issue, simply because it was wrong — or the projections were. And so I would say the same thing: [climate change] is just one in the endless parade of environmental apocalypse stories.
That’s simply not true. The scientific evidence has not become “stronger and stronger over time.” In fact, particularly with the pause, and the complete failure of the models, the uncertainty is growing.
Judith Curry addresses it:
…it is interesting to see Libertarian arguments about climate change policy they [sic] don’t seem overly caught up in the UNFCCC/IPCC ideology, or its antithesis ideology. The Climate Hawks (e.g. Dave Roberts) love this kind of libertarian ‘conversion’ story. But to my mind, Jerry Taylor’s argument for a carbon tax doesn’t really hold up.
Nope.
Pluto
Greg Benford says it’s about to get real.
There is no "Pluto of my imagination." I devote very little thought to Pluto. Never have. http://t.co/EMoXB3Wf89
— Rand Simberg (@Rand_Simberg) May 14, 2015
Barack Obama
Is he the most sexist president ever?
@TwitchyTeam Now Obama knows (sort of) how Bill Clinton felt when Team Obama accused him of being a racist.
— Rand Simberg (@Rand_Simberg) May 13, 2015
@TwitchyTeam It's nice to see the Democrats finally turning their divisive hateful rhetoric on each other. The rest of us can munch popcorn.
— Rand Simberg (@Rand_Simberg) May 13, 2015
Me, watching Dems circling wagons and firing hate artillery inward. @DaveCC1109 @TwitchyTeam pic.twitter.com/wAId79eWqC
— Rand Simberg (@Rand_Simberg) May 13, 2015
Elon Musk’s Space Dream
It started with sending mice to Mars, and got crazier from there.
Germany’s Green-Power Program
Hey, can’t make an omelette without breaking a few eggs.
The Pope
Seems to be coddling dictators and cozying up to liberation theology.
I wonder if the cardinals expected this? They shouldn’t be surprised, give his history.
Amtrak
It doesn’t need more taxpayer cash, it needs to be sold off, or given away. Actually, it’s not so much what it needs, but what the taxpayer needs. As noted, it’s primarily an income transfer scheme from lower-income taxpayers all over the country to the wealthy in the northeast corridor and union members.
[Update a few minutes later]
“‘Amtrak doesn’t get enough government money,’ is the kind of thing someone says when that person doesn’t understand anything about Amtrak, or government, or money.”
Heh.