…for a grandmother. Sarah Palin, that is:
The teenage daughter of former Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin has given birth to a son months after the announcement of her pregnancy became one of the first dark clouds to swirl over the Alaska governor’s candidacy.
I can do the math. Will the moronic troofers (including you-know-who, who should have known better, not to mention some of my moronic commenters) who demanded to see Sarah Palin’s birth records for Trig give it up, now?
Probably not. They’ll just claim that we have to see the birth records for Bristol.
I got a chill reading that on the Fox site, seems to me they don’t like the Palin family very much, maybe it’s because the article came from AP?
what’s amusing is the kid is named trip.
Wasn’t the kids other grandmother a drug dealer?
No, what’s amusing is that you’re such an ignorant moron that you can’t even spell the kid’s name right.
Maybe they watched ABC’s “Dirty Sexy Money” Tripp was the patriarch of that clan. All the garbage thrown at this family, just because she dared to try to make a difference.
sorry, i just heard the story on the Radio.
Trip, Tripp, Road Tripp, Head Tripp, Bad Tripp.
His grandmother is a drug dealer, at least according the
Alaskan State Police.
Of Course Rush Limbaugh is a Drug Criminal too
Of Course Rush Limbaugh is a Drug Criminal too
What’s the explanation for your delusions?
Jack Lee, I have a Dr. Freud on line one for you. Something about a slip?
Maybe for you I should spell that “slig” so you’ll read it as “slip.”
“Of Course Rush Limbaugh is a Drug Criminal too”
And your President-Elect smoked crack and proabally delt drugs. Do you have a point Jack or are you simply ‘Jacking-off’ as usual?
She’s the perfect argument against abstinence-only sex education. Palin is the gift that keeps on giving.
Yes, because birth control never fails.
And just how is it that you know she received abstinence-only sex education?
Pennypacker knows because Pennypacker is a know-it-all.
Who needs facts when you are a know-it-all?
Okay, I *assume* she received abstinence-only sex ed because that’s consistent with Palin’s view of how kids should be educated on the subject. I would’ve thought you guys would know this already, since you supported the woman.
Here’s one link, there are many more: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=94332508
It’s a fair assumption to make — either the woman lives by her values or she doesn’t.
Okay, I *assume* she received abstinence-only sex ed because that’s consistent with Palin’s view of how kids should be educated on the subject. I would’ve thought you guys would know this already, since you supported the woman.
Why do you have the strange fantasy that (even if she does support abstinence-only sex ed) we would know this, or that it would be why we supported her?
It’s a fair assumption to make — either the woman lives by her values or she doesn’t.
I’m pretty sure that she lives by the value that her kid will be taught whatever she’s taught in public school. It’s an asinine assumption, actually. Just like the one that I’m in favor of abstinence-only education because I preferred Sarah Palin to Senators Obama and Hairplugs.
Just like the one that I’m in favor of abstinence-only education because I preferred Sarah Palin to Senators Obama and Hairplugs.
Actually, I don’t make that assumption. I imagine you could have — and probably do have — have fairly complex political views.
Nor do I think that issue is *why* you supported her. The point I was making was that, because you supported her, I would imagine you would be interested in what her views are on different issues. But maybe that issue wasn’t a big concern for you, in the same way that I don’t care at all what Obama’s religious views are. So my apologies.
Apologies accepted.
But before you snark the next time, remember the old saying about the word “assume.”