Debunking Durbin

I didn’t watch, but reportedly Newt dismantled Dick Durbin on Meet the Press yesterday on the subject of the disingenuity (if not outright mendacity) of the Obama administration claims to be breaking from the Bush administration on military commissions and Guantanamo. Andy McCarthy makes him into rubble today.

2. Durbin’s “right of counsel” claim is a joke — and one you’d think Democrats would be too embarrassed to keep repeating given the number of Obama administration lawyers who, along with their former firms, spent the last eight years volunteering their services to America’s enemies. Under the Bush commission system, the terrorists already had U.S. taxpayer-funded military lawyers and were, in addition, permitted to retain private counsel — and there was no shortage of American private lawyers (such as several at Attorney General Eric Holder’s firm) who have taken up these cases. If there’s anything these terrorists have gotten plenty of, it’s top-flight legal representation.

3. The claim that “in seven years in Guantanamo there were exactly three [detainees] who were convicted by military commissions” is another screamer. The main reason for delay in the commissions process has been the aforementioned legion of volunteer American defense attorneys who ground the system to a halt by various court challenges. At the end of this legal barrage, the only real change in the commissions was a formal one — they are now authorized by Congress rather than by presidential directive (as Bush, like FDR, had used). As a practical matter (and Obama is all about being practical, right?), they operate exactly the same way. Moreover, the current delay — now in its fifth month, with several more months to go — is because President Obama himself stopped the pending commissions against 21 terrorists (when trial was imminent in several of them) so he could first “study” them and, now, propose these illusory “changes.

There’s a lot more. These people must think that we’re as stupid as they are.

5 thoughts on “Debunking Durbin”

  1. They don’t care if it’s true, they only care if it sounds good and muddies the water.

    How can Pelosi claim the CIA lied to congress? This is SOP.

  2. I have always thought Dick Durbin’s name was scary in it’s self-descriptive prowess.

  3. The Supreme court consistently refused to uphold the jacked up Military tribunals.

    You can’t have trials using secret evidence, and the evidence they have doesn’t meet any standard of law.

  4. “You can’t have trials using secret evidence, and the evidence they have doesn’t meet any standard of law.”

    Well then you better get to the White House website and let Obama know you disagree with him. Of course you haven’t seen the evidence and that doesn’t apply to all of the prisoners.

Comments are closed.