Technology Law

…will soon be reshaped by people who don’t use email:

as Electronic Frontier Foundation’s Parker Higgins convincingly argues, it’s not the justices’ lack of personal experience with technology that’s the problem; it’s their tendency to not understand how people use it. Returning to Justice Roberts’s concerns about villains with two phones: if he is in fact unaware of how common that behavior is – he certainly didn’t watch Breaking Bad – then that suggests a major gap in his understanding of society.

This lack of basic understanding is alarming, because the supreme court is really the only branch of power poised to confront one of the great challenges of our time: catching up our laws to the pace of innovation, defending our privacy against the sprint of surveillance. The NSA is “training more cyberwarriors” as fast as it can, but our elected representatives move at a snail’s pace when it comes to the internet. The US Congress has proven itself unable to pass even the most uncontroversial proposals, let alone comprehensive NSA reforms: the legislative branch can’t even get its act together long enough to pass an update our primary email privacy law, which was written in 1986 – before the World Wide Web had been invented.

So the future of our privacy, of our technology – these problems land at the feet of a handful of tech-unsavvy judges.

Kind of scary.

2 thoughts on “Technology Law”

  1. Our founders were some of the wisest well rounded people in society at the time. We don’t have that political class these days.

  2. Why is this a problem? Yes, we’re about to have people who are ignorant of technology decide technology law. That’s how our system works; people who don’t have a clue make the decisions. That’s why you get the Senate designing rockets, Obama decreeing medical policy, John Kerry deciding forign policy, Bohner on immigration, etc…

    It’s only a problem if you think a policy should result in something other than absolute disaster.

Comments are closed.