Why they aren’t the solution to ending mass shootings.
[Update a while later]
Why do we ignore all the mass murder of blacks in places like Chicago?
I call racism.
[Update a while later]
Yes, red-flag laws are stupid and useless.
Which distinguishes them in no way from the other proposals from the Left to end mass shootings.
[Late-afternoon update]
OK, from a tweet about how everyone in Red States carries AR-15s to the grocery store, this is hilarious.
[Friday-morning update]
No, mass shootings are not becoming more common, and yes, the media is going completely nuts.
The media don’t talk about places like Chicago, Baltimore, St. Louis, etc because those cities are completely run by the Dems (and have been for decades). If they pointed out all of the crime, especially murders, in the same way they point out random killings, the Dems would be exposed for their complete failure to address these situations.
And you can rest assured that if a Republican did ever win an election there, the violence, crime, and excrement would immediately be brought up.
I think there are improvements that could be made regarding reporting, and certainly risks that the idiots in DC will make it so that random pissed off people can take your guns away as an ironic joke.
From many of these cases, however, it would be kind of nice if we had a Constitutional way to deny the ownership of arms to anyone voted “Most likely to commit mass murder” by their high-school class.
Average person: I can get a gun if I am sane right?
Democrats: Yes. Any sane person can get a gun.
Average person: But only an insane person would want to have a gun?
Democrats: That’s right, only an insane person would want to have a gun.
Average person: So if I’m sane, I can get a gun but if I try to get a gun, then I’m insane and can’t get a gun?
Democrats: You are catching on.