…to social control.
I disagree with the last graf, though. The left has never been about the liberation of human beings or, if it imagines it was, it has always had the opposite effect whenever it gains control.
[Update a few minutes later]
A reminder: There are no socialist success stories.
A reminder: There are no socialist success stories.
Stossel fails to mention the only one I can think of: Jonestown. Of course it all hinges on what your definition of success is I suppose.
The left always has their Trotskyists and useful idiots.
“Bush hails from Missouri’s 1st Congressional District, which includes St. Louis, a city plagued by underdevelopment and violence (in 2020, its homicide rate hit a 50-year high).
Bush’s elevation to Congress gave her the opportunity to advocate for things like economic development and public safety for the people she represents”
She would have been better off running for local office if she wanted local change. But why would anyone vote for the same party whose policies haven’t provided solutions?
“The left has traditionally existed to liberate human beings”
When was this? The left has traditionally been about pitting different ethnic and class groups against each other to gain power.