“Friends Of The Moon”
Leonard David has the story of the budding lunar environmental movement.
Is this stupid? Why, yes, as a matter of fact. Yes, it is.
Rand Simberg: just a recovering aerospace engineer.
Leonard David has the story of the budding lunar environmental movement.
Is this stupid? Why, yes, as a matter of fact. Yes, it is.
This entry was posted on Friday, November 6th, 2009 at 9:07 am by Rand Simberg and is filed under Media Criticism, Philosophy, Political Commentary, Popular Culture, Science And Society, Weird. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
2010 © Transterrestrial Musings | Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS) | Violinesth Forever by Patrick
November 6th, 2009 at 9:20 am
Now we see the inevitable results of the Pet Rock on the American psyche.
November 6th, 2009 at 9:24 am
My brother is pretty good at analyzing stuff like this, and once attended a panel discussion of the “Hands off of Mars, rocks got rights” viewpoint at a science fiction convention. He asked one of the panelists whether they could stipulate that in order to have rights, an object has to have desires. I think that’s a very elegant way of clarifying the difficulty for people who for whatever reason don’t get it.
I forget how the panelist responded, but I think it was something like, “you’ve got a good point, but then there would be nothing for this panel to discuss.” In any case, it made my brother decide to go check out what else was going on.
November 6th, 2009 at 9:41 am
I wonder how much of this is just attention-seeking? There’re people who will say or do almost anything, if it means they get in the papers or draws attention to some cause. The Chicago group is probably doing the latter. Come on, we’ve seen this sort of fake sincerity troll since virtually the dawn of the internet. If they’re still protesting this twenty years from now, then we’ll know for what that’s worth that they really meant it.
November 6th, 2009 at 10:48 am
Kind of gives new meaning to the term “moonbat” doesn’t it?
From the urban dictionary: “Moonbat”
Any number of irrational and hysterical individuals whose self-indulgent intellectual indolence has led them to a visceral hatred of all things western. Moonbats tend to frequent anti-globalization and numerous other forms of rallies, demonstrations, sit-ins, and the like, tend to look dirty, and can frequently be heard using terms such as, “imperialism”. The mark of a true moonbat is the total lack of perspective (i.e. “if a dictator provides free healthcare, I like that dictator” – actual moonbat quote).
November 6th, 2009 at 11:31 am
‘Ecological impact.’ No ecology. No impact.
November 6th, 2009 at 12:09 pm
Unfortunately one of the consequences of social media is that it allows nuts like the Moon kooks to get more attention then they should. Really nature has been “bombing” the Moon for billions of years. Its a natural process.
November 6th, 2009 at 12:29 pm
::Smacks forehead:: Oh, good God…
November 6th, 2009 at 3:07 pm
I was wondering when this was going to start.
I can even agree, in part, considering all the junk in LEO.
November 7th, 2009 at 8:21 pm
NASA could turn the Moon into a lifeless barren wasteland where nothing can grow!
November 9th, 2009 at 4:49 pm
Oh drat. My former satire was targeted at the wrong celestial body. I forecast the Disney movie about “Parimeesee Sue” the single-celled animal on mars being victimized by the evil Terrans. Obviously I should have gone for “Boulder Bill” on the moon. I’ll have to find that comment and rewrite it for moons and rocks instead of Mars and single-celled microorganisms.