A weird and potentially wonderful new website.
[Monday-morning update]
Per a comment from Robert Smith, if you want to keep the site up, click on the choice buttons.
[Bumped]
A weird and potentially wonderful new website.
[Monday-morning update]
Per a comment from Robert Smith, if you want to keep the site up, click on the choice buttons.
[Bumped]
They haven’t changed with the success of this mission. It would have been a shock if, after all the money they’ve spent, and schedule delays, it hadn’t been successful.
[Monday-morning update]
Here is Eric Berger’s take, FWIW.
[Update a while later]
Scanning through the (as usual, largely ridiculous) comments over there, it strikes me that the real race between SpaceX and SLS was not whether SS/SH would fly before SLS, but whether SpaceX will send people around the moon before Artemis II. I think it’s quite likely.
[Bumped]
[Afternoon update]
Looking for the “S” word in Artemis.
Maybe, after all these decades, the time until fusion is finally being reduced. I wonder, if there’s a catch, what it is?
[Update]
People are saying it’s paywalled, but I saw it from Twitter, even thought I don’t subscribe.
Huh.
…is the psychotic bully of the western world.
[Update a few minutes later]
Vanguard backs down from ESG investing.
More, and faster, please.
An interesting new study on ISRU.
I do expect that the cost of getting to the moon will be dropping dramatically in the next decade, though.
Peter Hague knocks them down.
…is rejected by Professor Richard Lindzen.
…because he’s a Democrat darling.
His admission, as someone with billions of dollars under custody, that he didn’t think much about risk management is jaw dropping.
An interview with Judith Curry:
As he says, many were sheep, led by fools.