She already is.

And Joe Katzman says that she’s “country dumb.” And at this point, any “conservative” who would prefer Barack Obama to her has to be an idiot in full blither.

Thoughts on the collectivists’ attempts to split the Tea Party. Count me as an agnostic libertarian who has no problem with evangelical Christians, or church charity.

More thoughts. I, too, am mystified by the commenter who wants to grant tenure to all existing federal laws. To me, one of the benefits of the amendment would be in its potential to clean up the existing code.

Corey Maye has been granted the right to a new trial. In a just world, Radley Balko would get a Pulitzer for this.

Historical ignoramus:

Cantor, Bishop and the other supporters of the amendment believe they are rebalancing the Constitution in a way the Framers would like. But it’s strange that the lawmakers would show their reverence for the Founding Fathers by redrafting their work.

Hey, Dana. The Founders put an amendment process into the Constitution for a reason. Though I suspect that one reason that hadn’t occurred to them would be that people like you would decide that it was a “living document,” subject to perverse interpretation that would eviscerate it of their original intent.

[Afternoon update]

More thoughts on Milbank’s ignorance, from La Althouse.