I’m surprised there are only six reasons.
[Update a couple minutes later]
They didn’t even include this one.
I’m surprised there are only six reasons.
[Update a couple minutes later]
They didn’t even include this one.
This is the way to do it.
As the thread points out, you could just do one test per household, on the assumption that if one is infected, all are or will be. Hope the CDC/White House are aware of this thinking, because it makes a hell of a lot of sense to accelerate our knowledge of the scope.
[Early-afternoon update]
Turns out there’s a rapid-test device already available in hospitals.
Pennsylvania has made it both difficult and dangerous to purchase liquor.
Much of the response to this has been insane (and unconstitutional, and power grabby).
A history lesson relevant to the current crisis.
The Manchurian media wants you to forget their own terrible coverage.
When are they actually coronavirus deaths?
Dying with coronavirus does not necessarily imply dying from it.
RIP.
A great scientist, despite all the dragging by the climate hysterisists and warm mongers. Shame to lose him and Freeman so close together.
Sheila Jackson “Did the Mars rover see the Apollo site?” Lee is one of the stupidest people on the Hill (and that’s pretty stiff competition).
[Mid-morning update]
Jim Acosta, ace reporter.
Do patients need oxygen rather than pressure? Are we doing more harm than good with the ventilators?
[Via Kate McMillan, who has more]
[Update mid-afternoon]
This didn’t get much attention in comments a few days ago, but let’s try to boost the signal. I just did, on Twitter:
…between living and the economy.
And no one gets out of here alive.