Well, now who am I supposed to vote for?
“Cthulhu 2012!” Why settle for the lesser evil?
Oh, and the tweet du jour from Taranto: “Weird religion: Satan is against America. Normal religion: ‘God damn America.'”
Well, now who am I supposed to vote for?
“Cthulhu 2012!” Why settle for the lesser evil?
Oh, and the tweet du jour from Taranto: “Weird religion: Satan is against America. Normal religion: ‘God damn America.'”
[Wednesday-morning update]
I have a piece up a PJMedia about the latest climate fraud.
[Below was posted yesterday]
“…has just jumped upward a big notch.”
Also, Peter Gleick’s remarkable confession. Remarkable in the sense that it’s probably continued lying.
[Bumped]
Will SCOTUS punt it into 2016?
I sure hope not.
Doug Mohney wonders why the Texas congressional delegation seems to have its collective head up its fundament:
Two problems exist for the Congressional delegation from Texas if they continue to push SLS funding at the expense of fully funding NASA Commercial Crew program. First, it would appear that they advocate a policy that has the United States continue to purchase transport to ISS from Russia until SLS is built — rather than “insourcing” the dollars and work to American companies.
Second, if Russia’s spotty track record with the pieces to its manned launch system continues, a Soyuz failure leaving the $100 billion space station unmanned and untended — or worse, deorbited — could have a significant impact on the 15,000 employees employed at Houston’s Johnson Space Flight Center (JSC). If ISS goes down, there’s no need to have a Mission Control Center for its operations or the many other NASA employees and contractors supporting space station operations.
SLS mostly benefits Alabama, Florida and Utah — there is very little in it for Texas, which just makes this all the more stupid.
Ross Kaminsky called it:
If those climate alarmists who went after me (for what I said explicitly in my note was “my speculation”) had any honor, they would not just apologize, but feel some guilt for being associated with the religion of climate change whose high priests could sink to identity theft because they feel “frustration” at not being able to get the rest of the country to join their rent-seeking, anti-human cult.
In the meantime, I take some satisfaction in believing, though I’ll never know for sure, that my article gave Mr. Gleick some incentive to confess, before the FBI agent came to his door. Or perhaps he just didn’t want to spend the money on a new (non-Epson) scanner.
Note also the comments from Judith Curry, who has been one of the few people in the climate community actually acting like a scientist.
[Update a few minutes later]
The Johann Hari of climate “science.”
Kind of funny the sort of people they’ll hand out “Genius Awards” to.
[Update a couple minutes later]
But it was only a first offense: Gleick has apparently been removed from the AGU Task Force on Scientific Ethics. Gee, I’d have thought he’d be a poster boy.
[Update a few minutes later]
Related: Don’t know much about science books.
[Update a while later]
In apologizing, Gleick blames his victims:
Once you begin to believe that the success of the Cause justifies deceit and theft, how long until you begin making excuses for other crimes committed on behalf of the Cause? I do not accuse Peter Gleick and his fellow fanatics of any Stalinist ambitions, but when we see them engaged in Stalinist methods — publishing forged documents to smear their critics – aren’t we justified in suspecting that they are not otherwise honest?
Actually, I suspect that some of them harbor Stalinist ambitions (e.g., Holdren). What a piece of work this guy is.
It’s not his social conservatism, it’s that he’s a sourpuss.
Started today, on February 20th, 1962. Amy Teitel has the story (though the URL is wrong — it’s fifty, not sixty years), and Clark Lindsey has some other links. I’ve written a piece that I hope will go up at PJMedia, but if not, I’ll post it here later.
[Late morning update]
My piece is up now.
The event, which sold out all 4,000 tickets in 25 minutes, offers something to make every swine lover swoon: unlimited bacon samples, a bacon-eating contest, educational lectures, a bacon-themed songwriting contest and crowning of a new bacon queen. Organizers plan to serve up about three tons of the fatty strips.
They’re also prepared for a bit of oinking from outsiders.
A group of vegetarian doctors has been skewering Iowans over the event for months. Neal Barnard, president of the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, says he wants to publicize the flip side of bacon.
He says the PCRM plans to hand out fliers with warnings about how bacon “rotting in your mouth” potentially has various health risks, including cancer and diabetes.
I am aware of zero scientific evidence that anyone has ever gotten diabetes from eating bacon. And this is great:
Growing up in Fargo, N.D. …Dr. Barnard chowed down on bacon.
Both his father and grandfather were cattle ranchers. His palate changed, though, when he went off to Washington, D.C., for medical school.
A pathologist told Dr. Barnard, then 22 years old, to unlock a morgue freezer, pull out a body and help him examine the patient, dead from a heart attack.
The patient’s arteries were “hard as a rock,” Dr. Barnard recalls. The pathologist replied: “There’s your bacon and eggs, Neal.”
Soon, the medical student began to leave his carnivorous ways behind.
Primitive thinking like this is how ignorance is propagated. “You are what you eat.” “Big chief make crops grow.”
And we’re supposed to rely on these people for nutritional advice? And then let them force-feed our kids awful meals?
Hey, if you have ethical problems with eating animals, then be a vegan, but don’t delude yourself that it’s healthy, or that even if is for you that it will be for others. Now I’m curious as to what his cholesterol, blood pressure, and blood glucose levels are.
…will they sink Obama’s reelection chances?
The irony is that this is exactly what he told us he wanted to do in 2008, and they voted for him anyway. I guess they just weren’t listening.