It takes us back to our society half a century ago.
As I’ve said repeatedly, the part of the film that requires the most suspension of disbelief is that NASA would ever be sufficiently audacious and cost effective to send someone to Mars.
It takes us back to our society half a century ago.
As I’ve said repeatedly, the part of the film that requires the most suspension of disbelief is that NASA would ever be sufficiently audacious and cost effective to send someone to Mars.
I’ve been proposing this for years. You could also put sensors in the feet and knees to determine in-bounds and when a player does down.
His terrifying allure. An interesting story by one of his feminist “adversaries.”
…you can’t get your childhood back. As someone in my early twenties when it came back, I was a lot less impressed than the kids at the time. After the duds that were Eps 1-3, I’ll probably wait for it to be free on television. Encouraging thoughts from David Brin on what he calls the “best year for space since the 70s.” More thoughts on my USA Today piece, over at Ricochet. It’s essentially illegal. My latest column, about NASA in the movies and in real life, at USA Today. Movies like “Truth.” When you’ve lost Vox… Also, reminder. Mary Mapes, still stupid after all these years. Here’s news you can use: You’re pronouncing them wrong. I’ve never had a problem with Don Quixote, but shouldn’t “quixotic” be pronounced “Key-ah-tik”? Because Brit Hume said “quix-o-tic” the other day.Sorry, Star Wars Fans
Bootstrapping A Solar-System Civilization
Mars Is Safe From NASA
NASA Can’t Go To Mars
Why People Hate Hollywood “Liberals”
Fictional Characters’ Names