It’s good at woke politics, but when it comes to catching killers, not so much.
One of Trump’s biggest mistakes was appointing Wray to replace Comey. The whole organization needs a thorough housecleaning.
It’s good at woke politics, but when it comes to catching killers, not so much.
One of Trump’s biggest mistakes was appointing Wray to replace Comey. The whole organization needs a thorough housecleaning.
Doing it in mice and ferrets is good, but now let’s try it with humans. I’d volunteer (I have to get a root canal this afternoon).
We have a 2000 BMW 323i, with 180,000 miles on it. I’ve been doing a lot of work to get it running properly, including new plugs, and replacing a fuel injector and cleaning the rest. It’s no longer throwing any codes, but when I look at the fuel trim, it’s running very negative (ranging from -12 to -25, depending on RPM) on Bank 1 (cylinders 1-3). The other bank is much better, running between -3 to -6). This would indicate that it’s running fuel rich, but the O2 readings before and after the catalytic converters (one for each bank) are looking normal, and indicating that the cats are in good shape (i.e., flat output on the outlets, indicating that they’re eating the stuff they’re supposed to).
If it was both banks, I’d suspect a fuel overpressure or something, or maybe clogged intake, but it has a new fuel pump and air filter, and in any event, those would cause problems in both banks, not just the one, since they’re common to both. Any ideas?
[Saturday-afternoon update]
Welp, I hope the problem was a bad oxygen sensor on Bank 1, because I broke the wires on it when I pulled it…
[March 31st update]
Well, I replaced the oxygen sensor that I broke, and it’s showing the same thing. -18% at idle. So it wasn’t a sensor issue.
Hard to know what the problem could be, since the two banks differ only on the exhaust side, not the intake. All I can think is a bad fuel injector on one of the three cylinders, but only way to test that would be to swap them out, and it wouldn’t narrow it down to a single one, unless I did them one at a time, which would be a royal PITA, because it’s just as much work to change one as it is to change all of them, given that I’d have to put it back together each time to test it. But maybe I could start with the old ones, and leave the new one (on #1) for last.
[Bumped]
[Friday-afternoon update]
A new weirdness: I was seeing a misfire on cylinders 5 and 6 (bank 2). When I pulled the coils, they came out wet. There was a bunch of water in the spark-plug wells, though 1-4 were dry. I stuffed paper towels down into them, and soaked it up. No idea how it got there. But the car’s running pretty well now. I’ve giving up on the fuel-trim issue for now, though maybe I’ll take it over to my local Bimmer mechanic and ask him what he thinks.
Rest in peace, and ad astra.
He was about my age. Trying to remember the last time I saw him. I’m sure it was at a conference in 2019, before the end of conferences. I’m sure he’ll be showing Saint Peter the latest Rocketplane business plan.
I wonder what the improvements are? They really should have gone with a liquid engine years ago (after the accident in Mojave). They can’t fix the problem with the shuttlecock, but they could fix that.
I’ll look forward to learning what happened to the latest flight attempt.
Is there an SN12? Or will the next test be of SN15?
Thoughts on California’s deranged revival of them.
We flew to St. Louis yesterday for the weekend to visit Patricia’s family. Probably not much posting until Tuesday. Consider this an open thread.
Some thoughts from Bryan Preston.
I remember when Nancy moved up there. She told us she was planning it at a Halloween party in 2003 at the late Cathy Seipp’s place.