She refused to turn her therapy notes, which are key evidence, to the Judiciary Committee:
Now, I totally understand why someone would not want to turn over therapist records that undoubtedly discuss intimate details of one’s life. But if you are in the process of derailing a Supreme Court nominee based on otherwise unsubstantiated allegations of sexual misconduct thirty-six years ago, and in that process giving the nominee a reputation as a rapist, it seems to me you have the moral obligation to either turn over all relevant evidence, or withdraw your allegation. In the absence of that evidence and any corroboration beyond her say-so, if I were a Senator I would ignore the allegations.
Also, they would be part of a serious FBI investigation.
The story has fallen apart, and now they’re saying he lied about drinking beer.
[Update later morning]
Why sexual-assault survivors should be furious at the Democrats.
[Update a few minutes later]
This reminds me of the 90s when, after making progress against sexual harassment in the workplace, the Democrats and feminists threw it all overboard in order to defend Bill Clinton. In this case, they just destroyed the #MeToo movement.