Now That’s My Kind Of Cultural Imperialism

Professor Reynolds has a brilliant suggestion this morning.

I think it’s time for the United States to begin a massive public-education program, starting with distributing a lot of translated copies of The Federalist Papers. Most world leaders will probably hate that, which only adds to the fun.

Actually, it wouldn’t hurt to start in our own country. Perhaps even in Congress, though I’m not sure what language that you could translate them into that would have any hope of penetrating their statist skulls…

Now That’s My Kind Of Cultural Imperialism

Professor Reynolds has a brilliant suggestion this morning.

I think it’s time for the United States to begin a massive public-education program, starting with distributing a lot of translated copies of The Federalist Papers. Most world leaders will probably hate that, which only adds to the fun.

Actually, it wouldn’t hurt to start in our own country. Perhaps even in Congress, though I’m not sure what language that you could translate them into that would have any hope of penetrating their statist skulls…

Now That’s My Kind Of Cultural Imperialism

Professor Reynolds has a brilliant suggestion this morning.

I think it’s time for the United States to begin a massive public-education program, starting with distributing a lot of translated copies of The Federalist Papers. Most world leaders will probably hate that, which only adds to the fun.

Actually, it wouldn’t hurt to start in our own country. Perhaps even in Congress, though I’m not sure what language that you could translate them into that would have any hope of penetrating their statist skulls…

Ken, John, And Spike

There’s been a little ongoing discussion amongst Alex Knapp, the Uberblogger, and Boja Willy at Protein Wisdom, about the justice of prison rape (at least, I think that’s what the discussion is about).

I’ve got to go with Alex on this one. California politician Bill Lockyer was rightly castigated when he wished upon Ken Lay a sodomizing roommate named “Spike” a few months ago. That rape ever occurs in our prison system is an appalling indictment of it as an expensive, inhumane failure (at least to the degree that we have any hope for it being rehabilitative–it’s hard to see how this can contribute to an offender becoming a better citizen later), and the cause is the private (and occasionally public, as in l’affaire Lockyer vs Lay) attitudes and casual acceptance or blind eyes of our public officials to it. The War on (Some) Drugs, by overpopulating the system with non-violent offenders who are even more vulnerable to the few violent predators who haven’t been removed from it, in order to make room for them, makes it even worse.

If we truly believe that forced copulation is an appropriate punishment for anyone (though I have trouble conceiving of that as a just desert for anyone except perhaps, in the spirit of eye for eye, a rapist or child molestor), then we should make it the explicit punishment in law, and see if it will get past the Supreme Court and Bill-of-Rights scrutiny (gee, sounds like “cruel and unusual” to me, but what do I know…). Instead, we have a system in which the prison warden is simply given tremendous and arbitrary power over the well-being and ultimate punishment of the prisoners, far beyond what most legislators intended, or even conceived, when defining punishments for various illicit behaviors. And we all know what Lord Acton said about power…

[Monday Errata]

In my original post, I attributed the “Spike” comment about Ken Lay to Secretary of State Bill Jones. A thousand apologies. It was Attorney General Bill Lockyer who, as chief law enforcement officer for the state of California, should be even more ashamed of himself.

[2:10 PST Update]

Reader Quinbus Flestrin has a useful expansion on my theme:

Your presumption that rehabilitation is even a legal purpose of prisons or imprisonment in California is in error. Our betters have made it clear that they do not want anyone ever convicted of any crime to become “better citizens”. They just want to put people away, preferably for nonviolent and victimless “moral” offenses, and use them for slave labor.

CALIFORNIA PENAL CODE

SECTION 1170-1170.9

1170. (a) (1) The Legislature finds and declares that the purpose of imprisonment for crime is punishment. This purpose is best served by terms proportionate to the seriousness of the offense with

provision for uniformity in the sentences of offenders committing the same offense under similar circumstances. The Legislature further finds and declares that the elimination of disparity and the provision of uniformity of sentences can best be achieved by determinate sentences fixed by statute in proportion to the seriousness of the offense as determined by the Legislature to be imposed by the court with specified discretion.

* * end CPC cite * *

This provision, enacted overwhelmingly in the 80s IIRC, takes “rehabilitation” out of any legal issues regarding prisons. The only issue is whether punishment is “cruel and unusual”. As prison rape is hardly “unusual”, the only issue left is whether it is “cruel”. Even that is mooted by SCOTUS rulings (don’t ask for a cite, but IIRC the sainted “conservative” Thomas wrote one such decision), that “cruelty” can only be an issue in the *sentence*, not in how the sentence is carried out. If the judge doesn’t say “I sentence you to be raped in prison”, there is no issue.

So, if prison administrators, or prosecutors, decide to set forth prison rape as a policy (the administrators by encouraging it, the prosecutors by not prosecuting offenders), there is no real legal impediment to their doing so. (Don’t ever believe a prosecutor who says they have no discretion over which criminal accusations to prosecute–they have complete discretion.)

With the passage of California’s Prop. 21 in ’98 or so, prosecutors now have virtually complete discretion in whether juveniles are tried and sentenced as adults. Around the same time, Prop. 179 allowed prisons to contract out prisoners for labor in private industry.

The circuit for moral and financial corruption in California’s criminal “justice” system is complete. Prosecutors and police can select children for rape fodder to be used by prison administrators to further debase and corrupt their prisoner slave laborers.

Those who voted for such propositions, or who supported legislators enacting such laws, and who further cried out for more harsh criminal court procedures and sentencing, and “zero tolerance” for kids who even unwittingly carry a plastic butterknife to make their school lunch sandwiches, can now congratulate themselves. Of course, when their child is sent up the river to be Bubba’s girlfriend for carrying a butterknife to school in his lunchbox, they’ll whine that they didn’t really mean it. But the courts will say “Tough, the law is unambiguous. Government can do any of this. It’s nice work if you can get it. If you don’t like it, change the law.”

Don’t get me started on “Zero Intelligence^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^HTolerance.” I’ll save that rant for another post.

Moral: Be careful what you ask for. You might get it.

Indeed.

Stop Her Before She Kills Again

Nicholas Stix tears into Tina Brown, calling her a spoiled, serial killer of magazines. He’s not much easier on all of the softheaded liberal moneybags who continue, inexplicably, to worship and fund her (though maybe Talk will be the last straw).

When poor folks think the world owes them a living, we call that a welfare mentality. And when rich folks think the world owes them a living, I call it a … welfare mentality.

RINO Stampede

First New York, now California. The folks over at Free Republic have a name for people like Michael Bloomberg and Dick Riordan–Republicans In Name Only (RINO).

In today’s LA Times, Mr. Riordan, who is running for the Republican nomination for California governor, opines that “you can’t live on minimum wage.” I expect this kind of nonsense from a Democrat, but when a so-called Republican says it, I wonder what the point is of having two parties. In fact, as much as I think that Gray Davis is a political abomination, I’m wondering in what way that Dick Riordan would be an improvement. I suppose it doesn’t matter, because even though I own property in California, I don’t vote there. Unfortunately, I do pay property taxes, and I’m sure that I’ll eventually regret the outcome, either way. I was encouraged to see Rudy Giuliani endorse his former assistant Bill Simon in the race, but I suspect that such an endorsement will be of more benefit in the general election than in a Republican primary, since Rudy is somewhat of a RINO himself…

Oh, and why was what Riordan said nonsense, you ask? First of all, because it’s not true, there are places where one can live simply but comfortably, even in California, on the minimum wage.

But more to the point, no one is supposed to live on a minimum wage. If you have to support yourself, or a family, it is your responsibility to improve yourself, through education. experience and/or skills development, so that you’re worth more than that. No one is entitled to a given wage simply because they can fog a mirror.

What driving up the minimum wage does is throw people out of work whose labor is only worth minimum wage or less, (e.g., teenagers after school). When one considers the devastating unemployment rate of African Americans in the inner city, the minimum wage should be properly viewed as a racist plot to keep young blacks and hispanics out of the job market and force them into drug pushing and prostitution, where no one in Sacramento worries overmuch about their wages. I’ve never heard that argument made in either the LA or New York Times, though…

Wiccans Vs Unitarians

And in this corner…

Today’s Opinion Journal has a little story about a wiccan who’s suing a congregation of the Unitarian church for, among other things, calling her a “humpbacked, toothless, redneck hillbilly witch.” (Hmmmm…wonder what she names her place?).

They were upset with her because she refused to teach them wiccan rituals, and also because she refused to conform to their new-age feminist stereotypes. Pretty amusing stuff if you’ve ever had much dealings with Unitarians. I used to be one until I realized (in my youth) that, in many ways, their (non)religion was the wackiest of them all.

Wrong, Right Out Of The “Enron” Box

In an article titled “The Enron Box,” author Matt Bivens and The Nation attempts once again to pin the tail on the elephant.

Here’s the lead sentence:

When George W. Bush co-owned the Houston Astros and construction began on a new stadium, Kenneth Lay agreed to spend $100 million over thirty years for rights to name the park after Enron.

Only one problem. Bush co-owned the Texas Rangers, not the Houston Astros.

Do you, like me, wonder what else they got wrong? Considering the source, is it even worth bothering to read the rest?

Wrong, Right Out Of The “Enron” Box

In an article titled “The Enron Box,” author Matt Bivens and The Nation attempts once again to pin the tail on the elephant.

Here’s the lead sentence:

When George W. Bush co-owned the Houston Astros and construction began on a new stadium, Kenneth Lay agreed to spend $100 million over thirty years for rights to name the park after Enron.

Only one problem. Bush co-owned the Texas Rangers, not the Houston Astros.

Do you, like me, wonder what else they got wrong? Considering the source, is it even worth bothering to read the rest?

Biting Commentary about Infinity…and Beyond!